An MRI comes with two parts: 1.) Films, which I received immediately after the MRI was performed, and 2.) A report of findings, which was to be prepared within a few days. Despite having never seen MRI films before, I had done just enough internet research by that point to have a vague idea of the anatomy in question. The ACL can typically be seen from the cross section that shows the profile view near the center of the knee. In my case, where I expected to see the ACL, I saw nothing but a blur of pain and debris. Nothing else looked obvious, except for a lot of thin, jagged lines in the top of the tibia and bottom of the femur (bruising of the bones I was later told), and a line in the medial meniscus, which looked to me like a possible tear. Still, I held out hope for my ACL as I talked to other people who had been through the injury and I compared their symptoms to my own. I researched the surgical options for reconstruction and none of them were good. In order to get any sleep at all for those first few nights I clung with increasing dedication to the 20% uncertainty of the doctor and my own likely inability to accurately interpret the MRI. And then the following Tuesday I had a follow-up appointment and the nurse handed me the MRI report and left me alone in the exam room. My eyes skipped down to the report summary:
1.) Complete tear of the ACL near the femoral attachment.
I stopped reading but continued to stare at the paper. The words were short and simple and impossible to misinterpret. A week’s worth of devoted optimism and wishful thinking had apparently not been enough to change reality. And the reality was that my knee had been seriously and permanently damaged in a instant on Christmas day. To my surprise, dealing with the physical aspect of the injury, at least initially, would be only half of the battle.
No comments:
Post a Comment